Dear Citizens of Queensland,
My name is Dr William Bay, I am the leader of the Queensland Peoples’ Protest (QPP) and a registered practising QLD-based doctor.
I have been asked by members of our community to outline the reasons why my organisation is visiting and protesting different sites around Queensland.
QPP has now toured 24 different locations across QLD as part of our State Undemocracy Tour to bring awareness to residents that their MPs were complicit in the ending of parliamentary democracy on the 31st March 2022 with the amendment to the Public Health Act 2005 under section 362B (Reference No. 1) that gives the Chief Health Officer unreviewable powers to make any directive he believes is necessary as long as it is connected to preventing the spread of Covid-19. The CHO’s powers are absolute with the Supreme Court and the Premier unable to review them.
These powers are unconstitutional, illegal and immoral because they override all laws and considerations pertaining to due process, human rights, and basic Western freedoms like freedom to transact, speak and move. Consequently, this law cannot be allowed to stand.
Furthermore, the tyranny in QLD is set to be multiplied with the impending vote on the:
Health Practitioner Regulation National Law and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2022 (Reference No. 2) which is before the QLD Parliament now. It is a bill introduced by Health Minister Yvette D’Ath and was reviewed by the Health and Environment Committee headed by Chair, Aaron Harper member for Thuringowa, who disappointingly recommended the bill be passed.
The committee determined that the key objective of the bill was to strengthen public safety and confidence in the provision of health services.
The legislation’s key reform is to refocus the objectives and guiding principles of the existing National Law to make public safety and confidence paramount considerations.
It is worth noting that If the bill is passed in QLD it automatically applies to all state and territories except WA and SA which must (but will very likely) update their laws.
The threat of this bill is that it seeks to make “public confidence in health services” as the paramount principle of all our healthcare.
This is a radical departure from the previously well-established and respected principle of patient-centred care.
The RACGP and AMA have expressed concerns over this refocusing of healthcare, and professional indemnity insurance companies like MIGA and the Insurance Council of Australia have agreed that the term ‘public confidence’ lacks a clear definition and scope, and they raised concerns about how courts and tribunals would interpret the term.
The Queensland Peoples’ Protest argues strongly that the passing of this legislation will end the practice of medicine as we know it and will result in the death of informed consent, medical ethics, and the very lives of many Queenslanders and Australians.
This is because when treatment of patients is not guided by their individual circumstances (medical history, medications, allergies etc.) but by the principle of what makes the Department of Health in each state look most trustworthy; then mistakes and indeed, incorrect treatments of patients is bound to occur.
Mistakes in medical treatment will inevitably lead to patient deaths, deaths that can and will be directly attributable to the passage of this inherently unconscionable bill.
The Queensland Peoples’ Protest urges all Queenslanders to write to their state MP and demand the blockage of this bill lest all our medical freedoms are eroded and unimaginable patient harm occurs to you or your loved ones.
Dr William A. Bay
MBBS (Hons.) M.Ed B.Bus Dip.F.S.
Leader of the Queensland Peoples’ Protest
GP Registrar, Brisbane, QLD Australia
1. Public Health Act 2005
2. Report No. 21 - 57 Parliament Health and Environment Committee July 2022
@aussiewhip.7 #Patriotswithoutborders🇦🇺🇳🇿🇨🇦🇬🇧🇺🇸🇳🇱🇮🇪🏴 #freedomfighters💪🙏 ♬ original sound - Aussiewhip7
Australian Government is Put on Notice by Medical Professionals
The Australian Medical Professionals’ Society (“AMPS”) has published an email sent to all Australian colleges and associations of medicine, health and science and copied to all Australian Federal, State and Territory Senators and Members of Parliament.
Signed by incoming AMPS president, Associate Professor Christopher Neil, the email states:
“This email deals with several issues which are of concern to our membership and, we hope, yours. At the top of the list is the issue of medical free speech and its ramifications for true dialogue, debate, and informative patient interaction in Australia.
“We implore you as fellows and colleagues to give the information and resource contained in this email your greatest attention, with a view to sharing the same with your members.”
You can read the email HERE as well as some important attachments like THIS report by Dr. Phillip Altman and the ‘Parliamentary Health Reform Declaration & Urgent Demands’ prepared by two legal practitioners who have advised and worked with the Australian Vaccination-risks Network in their recent Federal Court cases.
Dr. Phillip Altman’s Report
Dr Phillip Altman has expertise in the areas of clinical medical research and pharmaceutical drug regulatory affairs in Australia. His 107-page report has been used in modified formats to assist judiciaries in Australia and New Zealand to understand the scientific evidence behind the Covid injections.
Amongst others, it covers the nature of the Covid gene-based “vaccines, how they work, the serious adverse effects, the potential toxicity of the spike protein and the long-term potential genetic damage and cancer potential. In conclusion, Dr. Altman wrote:
The introduction and worldwide use of Covid-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ has been associated, in the short term, with far more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities than any other therapeutic agent in the history of medicine. Due to the total lack of any long-term safety data, the potential future iatrogenic effects (including neurological, immunological and carcinogenic effects) may be even more devasting.
Despite initial claims, the Covid-19 gene-based ‘vaccines’ have now been shown to possess disappointing clinical efficacy – they neither prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection nor do they prevent transmission of the virus; any immunological protection wanes rapidly and, coincident with the emergence of the Omicron variant, evidence of negative vaccine efficacy is being reported in many countries including Australia.
In light of widely reported emerging and compelling evidence, there appears to be little scientific or clinical justification to support vaccine mandates as a health policy.
The latest hospital admission statistics do not support the claim that unvaccinated individuals are more at risk of serious Covid-19 disease, hospitalisation or death. Excess non-Covid-19 related deaths coincident with the introduction of the gene-based ‘vaccines’ are now being reported by many countries, and suggest a surge in heart attack and stroke among both the young, adolescents and middle age individuals (especially males).
The knowledge that the synthetic mRNA in both the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines can enter the nucleus of human liver cells in culture, raises the serious questions about genotoxicity and carcinogenicity, and adverse impact on future generations. Disturbing safety signals regarding fertility and miscarriages are emerging.The Time of Covid, Dr. Phillip M. Altman, 9 August 2022, pg. 42
Parliamentary Health Reform Declaration & Urgent Demands
The “safe to sign” Declaration proposes amendments to the National Law and Therapeutics Goods Act. It has been prepared by the AMPS, Australian Medical Network, Medical Action Group and United Health Australia/Queensland Health Practitioners Alliance.
The Declaration begins with a quote from a legal opinion the parties obtained reassuring potential signatories that it is “safe to sign”:
Unlike publicly expressing opinions that deviate from the official Covid medical narrative, the Declaration is safe to sign because it is your right as a citizen and professional to request legislative change.
Please keep in mind that no Health Professional can be sanctioned or reprimanded for seeking reform of the laws that govern them, and the laws that control how drugs enter and are regulated in our community.Parliamentary Health Reform Declaration & Urgent Demands
It is hoped that a strong showing of signatures of Australian health professionals and scientists will lead Australian parliamentary representatives:
- to consider the vaccine mandates and the real scientific data more closely; and,
- to realise the importance of the proposed legislative amendments that will direct the Therapeutic Goods Administration (“TGA”) to more responsibly and transparently review and present the science underpinning provisional approvals of new products; and,
- realise the importance of the proposed legislative amendments that will preserve the practitioner-patient/client relationship, for the open discussion of risk/benefit decisions in providing Australians with the basis to give or decline true informed consent and thus respect bodily autonomy.
“With your support,” the Declarations authors wrote, “we believe, these Proposed Amendments have a real chance of being enacted into laws:
- that better protect the health and safety of all Australians;
- for enshrining and protecting the doctor-patient relationship;
- establishing new prohibitions against government health messaging which is misleading and lacking in supporting data;
- for ensuring our TGA provide better consumer information and protections and data and safety procedures for provisionally approved drugs;
- for protecting health professionals who inform their communities on issues of health and courses of treatment, which their expertise equips them to do, without fear of sanctions from [Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Authority] AHPRA or their national board;
- while empowering all health professionals with new procedures ensuring health professionals determine their own codes of conduct, standards, and public health messages, not what national boards or AHPRA seek to dictate be said or done, as is currently occurring often with little or no consultation with health professionals.”
AMPS Puts All Medical Organisations and Parliamentarians on Notice
AMPS’ email is an extremely well-referenced science-based document that puts the addressees on notice that they must notify their membership (in the case of the Colleges) and must support moves to allow health professionals to practice according to the science and not simply based on Government policies. It notifies them that AHPRA is not legally within its rights to censor or suppress opposing views on this subject.
Some of the facts contained in the AMPS letter are as follows.
In a joint statement received from AHPRA and the national boards on 9 March 2021, Australian Health Professionals numbering over 825,000 were essentially forbidden from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging Covid-19 injectables, let alone questioning any government messaging urging Australians to be vaccinated because these products were deemed ‘safe and effective’.
A peer-reviewed investigation has demonstrated that mRNA-derived spike proteins enter the cell nucleus and interfere with DNA.
The implied and intended outcome of the gagging was to see doctors and health professionals effectively mandated to support the government campaign to have the Australian population injected with drugs for which there was no adequate short, medium, or long-term safety or efficacy data.
To date, no other drugs in human history have reported more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities, which number as follows (to 28 June 2022) – Please note, that the URF (under-reporting factor) for these events is conservatively estimated to be between 40 and 49 times:
The TGA has received more adverse event reports in 2021 through June 2022 for the Covid-19 vaccines, than has been seen for all other vaccines in the preceding 50-year period.
The letter concludes by asking these organisations to take the information seriously and to please share it with their members.
Personally, I don’t trust these organisations to do the right thing even if they were being paid to do so. Aside from sharing this in all the normal channels on social media and email lists, please do send copies to your local Federal and State Members and Senators as well as to any health professionals you know and any media outlets near you.
If we all show that we demand accountability for the medical tyranny currently being perpetrated in this country, we will find that it will have a really positive effect. Hundreds of thousands of us raising our voices will ensure they are heard.
At the very least, none of the individuals we share this information with can ever claim that they didn’t know about the harm and deaths caused by these experimental jabs. And they will be held personally and severally accountable if they do not take action to stop it.
By Rhoda Wilson
It is with great pleasure that I introduce you and your respective organisations to the Australian Medical Professionals Society. This email deals with several issues which are of concern to our membership and, we hope, yours. At the top of the list is the issue of medical free speech and its ramifications for true dialogue, debate, and informative patient interaction in Australia. Also, this email and the report of Dr Phillip Altman, makes available to you and your members a cutting edge update on the COVID-19 vaccinations and a comprehensive analysis of associated Adverse Events, together with implications for Australian practice. Finally, we draw your attention to our Health Reform Declaration, a statement which is gaining support as it highlights critical issues and potential solutions, within the complex environment of Australian Health Law.
Australian Health Professionals and Scientists have been actively discussing and contemplating the profound health measures undertaken within Australia over the last 2&1/2 years. However, we believe the current range of medical, medicolegal and medicopolitical issues brought about by the pandemic requires a greater breadth of discussion – not less – within and between our respective organisations and memberships.
One of the chief concerns of our membership is that of medical free speech. Contingent to a joint statement received from AHPRA and the National Boards on 9 March 20211, Australian Health Professionals numbering over 825,000 were essentially forbidden from publicly questioning the science underlying the emerging COVID-19 injectables, let alone questioning any government messaging urging Australians to be vaccinated because these products were deemed ‘safe and effective’. The effect of this unilateral action was to undermine professional independence and, in so doing, strip away years of training, academic achievements, qualifications, awards and expertise. However well intentioned, this gagging by bureaucratic decree inserted AHPRA and the National Boards between the Clinician and their Patient, in addition to counteracting normal robust interprofessional dialogue, as more data emerged.
Indeed, now 17 months later and after numerous forms of pressure to take up the COVID-19 injectables in various age categories, a tremendous amount of data is available to more fully and accurately inform clinicians about these products. This literature includes over one thousand2 peer reviewed studies reporting of the harms being seen around the world, up to December 2021. In addition, it has become clear that the risk of serious illness and death attributable to COVID-19 disease is heavily weighted to the elderly and those with known co-morbidities, while in contrast, younger Australians are relatively resistant. Also, since the advent of the Delta and Omicron variants, it is highly questionable whether the vaccines are preventing transmission or illness.
In any event, the implied and intended outcome of the gagging was to see Doctors and Health Professionals effectively mandated to support the government campaign to have the Australian population injected with drugs for which there was no adequate short-, medium-, or long-term safety or efficacy data. Indeed, the rush to market and Provisional Approval occurred despite the absence of the usual pre-clinical studies, including testing for Carcinogenicity and Genotoxicity. In this regard, it should be of serious interest that a peer-reviewed investigation3 has demonstrated that mRNA-derived Spike proteins enter the cell nucleus and interfere with DNA. However, many critical facts like these became forbidden subjects for Health Professionals and Doctors to raise with their patients, let alone in public forums. Thus, we contend that the joint statement of 9 March 2021 has compromised proper and informed consent in Australia.
Especially given the lack of available pre-clinical research for each of these products, or clinical studies powered to detect early safety signals at the time of Provisional Approval, the need for ongoing critical appraisal of pharmacovigilance data remains paramount, to instruct responsible day to day practice. To date, none of the makers of the COVID-19 injectables have been able to stringently show their products to be Safe or properly Effective. To date, Adverse Events flowing from these products are at historically unprecedented levels globally and continue to rise. And again, to date, no other drugs in human history have reported more deaths, illnesses, injuries, and disabilities, which number as follows (to 28 June 2022):
It is widely acknowledged that all Adverse Event reporting systems suffer from under-reporting12, an inherent challenge for passive reporting systems and their interpretation. For US VAERS reporting in respect of the COVID-19 injectables, the Under-Reporting Factor (URF) has been estimated to be between 40-49x13. If a conservative URF of 10x is applied, the above figures begin to more realistically represent the likely true effects of the Covid-19 injectables:
To be clear, the TGA has received more Adverse Event reports in 2021 through June 2022 for the COVID-19 vaccines, than they have been seen for all other vaccines in the preceding 50-year period. A similar explosion in Adverse Event reports for the COVID-19 injectables has occurred in all other countries that chose to deploy them14, but in Australia, comparing the period from 197115 until the start of 2021 in respect of traditional protein-based vaccines, to the period from 1 February 2021 through 8 June 2022 in respect of the COVID-19 injectables, we observe the following:
To assist your organisation and membership to understand the causes leading to these concerning signals, we provide to you the comprehensive and up-to-date report of Dr Phillip Altman. By way of background, Dr Altman’s report has been used in modified formats to assist judiciaries in Australia and New Zealand to understand the scientific evidence behind the COVID-19 injectables. We believe it is proving to be the long-awaited body of work needed by the Judicial, Medical, and Scientific communities of Australia, to bring clarity by critical scientific appraisal during these controversial times of COVID-19.
Since your organisation is now in possession of the information and resources contained in the linked report, we ask that your members also receive the same for the benefit of their being fully informed as to the state of the science surrounding COVID-19. After considerable consultation, AMPS is of the opinion that Australia is experiencing a highly significant iatrogenic event. Further, we believe that this did not have to occur: it could have been avoided, but for the state of Australia’s health law leading into the pandemic. AMPS is strenuously of the view that in order to avoid a repeat of the recent past, Australian health law requires urgent reform. To this end we invite every organisation receiving this email, including every parliamentarian CC’d, to review the Declaration and Urgent Demands for healthcare law reform set forth on the following page:
On the above Declaration page is also found Proposed Amendments to the Health Practitioner Regulation National Law, and Proposed Amendments to the Therapeutic Goods Act.
Many organisations receiving this email have members who are directly affected by the overarching powers of AHPRA and the National Boards, who have tended to dictate rather than consult with their registered members. This has caused a dangerous interference with the provision of information, for the purpose of each Australian exercising their right to fully Informed Consent, while it has also unduly and harshly seen Health Professionals sanctioned for seeking to uphold ethics and their Codes of Conduct.
It is not only regarding COVID-19 that AHPRA has been perceived to show over-reaching powers. Dissatisfaction and fear of AHPRA is widespread amongst many health professionals as evidenced by the Victorian branch of the AMA calling for a Royal Commission16 into AHPRA’s conduct.
Equally, we say it is evident that Australians have suffered as a consequence of the Provisional Approval pathway laws. These have facilitated the rapid entry of significantly undertested products into the Australian market, despite their being recognised to be highly novel and experimental. Nonetheless, the COVID-19 injectables were mandated in many jurisdictions and workplaces, causing large numbers of Australians to feel coerced and simultaneously baffled by the inability of Doctors and other Health Professionals to give them a voice.
This can all be changed.
We implore you as fellows and colleagues to give the information and resource contained in this email your greatest attention, with a view to sharing the same with your members. There will doubtless be many questions arising from our email and we invite further discussion with you. All of your considerations and efforts towards the continued promotion of evidence-based medical science are greatly appreciated.
Associate Professor Christopher Neil
MBBS, FRACP, PhD
Australian Medical Professionals Society
 https://www.adrreports.eu/en/covid19_message.html - Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, Janssen
 Individual reports refer to a single patient, where more than one adverse reaction is often included.
 https://openvaers.com/covid-data (only US/Territories) – Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca
 Individual reports refer to a single patient, where more than one adverse reaction is often included.
 https://www.tga.gov.au/periodic/covid-19-vaccine-weekly-safety-report-23-06-2022 – Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca
 Individual reports refer to a single patient, where more than one adverse reaction is often included.
 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting – Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca
 Individual reports refer to a single patient, where more than one adverse reaction is often included. The 458,463 reports received to 24 June 2022 reported a total of 1,495,273 various forms of adverse reaction.
 See DAEN website for no. of adverse events non-COVID vaccines and Covid injectables.
AMPS - Australian Medical Professionals' Association
P: (07) 3497 5048 | email@example.com | www.amps.asn.au